Well while discussing a few topics on another blog, a few things another person said made me chuckle inside. To start, it is important that you know what logical fallacies are. Here is a humorous example:

Now AV (the person I was talking to) links to these all the time. Just about every-other comment on the blog we were talking about had a link from him. Now that you know that, here was our conversation:
-Gordon- Evolution makes it very hard to believe in an interventionist God, but its perfectly possible to believe in evolution and still believe in God. Lots of people do, including the pope.
- AV comments twice in between here, then I begin commenting.
-Me- AV, why didn’t you accuse Gordon of “Argument from popular belief fallacy”? He specifically said: “Lots of people do, including the pope.” Would that not be an appeal to authority as well? Do we only correct those whom oppose us?
-AV- Stop whining. If Gordon is guilty of arguing from popular belief, then the fact that you are able to recognise this reassures me that you have at least been capable of learning something from our conversation. But the notion that two wrongs make a right, which is where you appear to be heading now, is also a fallacy.
Now this is funny: I have been told to stop whining from somebody who links to these logical fallacies very often. Not only that, but he immediately accuses me of commiting another logical fallacy…
Av, I would appreciate it if you would not accuse me of things you are far more guilty of.



In biology today we did an excercise to help each other better understand ‘natural selection’.
Recent Comments